Back to Search Start Over

Kappa Index versus CSF Oligoclonal Bands in Predicting Multiple Sclerosis and Infectious/Inflammatory CNS Disorders.

Authors :
Ferraro, Diana
Bedin, Roberta
Natali, Patrizia
Franciotta, Diego
Smolik, Krzysztof
Santangelo, Mario
Immovilli, Paolo
Camera, Valentina
Vitetta, Francesca
Gastaldi, Matteo
Trenti, Tommaso
Meletti, Stefano
Sola, Patrizia
Source :
Diagnostics (2075-4418). Oct2020, Vol. 10 Issue 10, p856-856. 1p.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) kappa free light chains (KFLC) are gaining increasing interest as markers of intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis. The main aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy (AUC) of the kappa index (CSF/serum KFLC divided by the CSF/serum albumin ratio) compared to CSF oligoclonal IgG bands (OCB) in predicting Multiple Sclerosis (MS) or a central nervous system infectious/inflammatory disorder (CNSID). Methods: We enrolled patients who underwent a diagnostic spinal tap throughout two years. KFLC levels were determined using a Freelite assay (Binding Site) and the turbidimetric Optilite analyzer. Results: Of 540 included patients, 223 had a CNSID, and 84 had MS. The kappa index was more sensitive (0.89 versus 0.85) and less specific (0.84 versus 0.89), with the same AUC (0.87) as OCB for MS diagnosis (optimal cut-off: 6.2). Adding patients with a single CSF IgG band to the OCB-positive group slightly increased the AUC (0.88). Likewise, the kappa index (cut-off: 3.9) was more sensitive (0.67 versus 0.50) and less specific (0.81 versus 0.97), with the same AUC (0.74) as OCB, for a CNSID diagnosis. Conclusion: The kappa index and CSF OCB have comparable diagnostic accuracies for a MS or CNSID diagnosis and supply the clinician with useful, complementary information. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20754418
Volume :
10
Issue :
10
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Diagnostics (2075-4418)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
146660825
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10100856