Back to Search Start Over

A comparative study on phenazone degradation by sulfate radicals based processes.

Authors :
Gong, Han
Chu, Wei
Gan, Lu
Gong, He
Lin, Jingjun
Wang, Qinxing
Lai, Wing Yiu
Xu, Lijie
Source :
Environmental Research. Dec2020, Vol. 191, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

In this paper, a comparative study on removal of the emerging pollutant phenazone (PNZ) by two treatment processes UVA/Fe(II)/persulfate (PS) and UVA/Fe(II)/peroxymonosulfate (PMS) was conducted. The two processes showed high efficiency in PNZ degradation, followed by a reasonable mineralization. The treatment system with PMS was found to be more efficient for PNZ degradation than that with PS due to the larger amounts of radicals generated. While the treatment process UVA/Fe(II)/PS showed higher ΔTOC/ΔSMX (TOC removal per unit of PNZ decay) than UVA/Fe(II)/PMS process. The sulfate and hydroxyl radicals played dominant roles in PNZ degradation in the UVA/Fe(II)/PS and UVA/Fe(II)/PMS process, respectively. Six and seven intermediates during PNZ degradation by UVA/Fe(II)/PS and UVA/Fe(II)/PMS process were detected, respectively. Among the detected intermediates, six of them are found for the first time. It takes shorter time for toxicity elimination by UVA/Fe(II)/PS process than UVA/Fe(II)/PMS, possibly due to the lower Kow values of hydroxylated products. The results demonstrate that UVA/Fe(II)/PMS process is more efficient in PNZ degradation, while UVA/Fe(II)/PS is more efficient in detoxification of PNZ. The two sulfate radicals based processes have good potentials in degradation, mineralization and detoxification of the emerging contaminants such as PNZ. • Two systems were studied systematically for efficient reduction of phenazone. • Image 1 and OH were dominant radicals in PS and PMS system, respectively. • More radicals were generated for faster degradation in PMS system than PS system. • The PS system is more efficient in detoxification of phenazone than PMS system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00139351
Volume :
191
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Environmental Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
146811929
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110054