Cite
Clinical efficacy comparison of low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation and Nd:YAG laser in treating recurrent acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
MLA
Qin, Qiyu, et al. “Clinical Efficacy Comparison of Low-Temperature Plasma Radiofrequency Ablation and Nd:YAG Laser in Treating Recurrent Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction.” Lasers in Medical Science, vol. 35, no. 9, Dec. 2020, pp. 1937–44. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-02982-8.
APA
Qin, Q., Li, B., Ming, J., Liu, B., Mou, Y., & Jin, X. (2020). Clinical efficacy comparison of low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation and Nd:YAG laser in treating recurrent acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Lasers in Medical Science, 35(9), 1937–1944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-02982-8
Chicago
Qin, Qiyu, Bihua Li, JinJin Ming, Bo Liu, Yujie Mou, and Xiuming Jin. 2020. “Clinical Efficacy Comparison of Low-Temperature Plasma Radiofrequency Ablation and Nd:YAG Laser in Treating Recurrent Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction.” Lasers in Medical Science 35 (9): 1937–44. doi:10.1007/s10103-020-02982-8.