Back to Search Start Over

An audit of microplastic abundance throughout three Australian wastewater treatment plants.

Authors :
Ziajahromi, Shima
Neale, Peta A.
Telles Silveira, Isabel
Chua, Andrew
Leusch, Frederic D.L.
Source :
Chemosphere. Jan2021, Vol. 263, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have been identified as an important pathway of microplastics to the environment. Most studies have focused on wastewater effluent, but generally only a small fraction of microplastics entering WWTPs are present in treated effluent. Instead, the majority of microplastics are expected to be retained in the sludge. To our knowledge, there is limited information on microplastics in sludge/biosolids from Australian WWTPs, despite 75% of biosolids produced in Australia being used for agriculture. This study evaluated the abundance of microplastics throughout the treatment trains of three WWTPs in Australia. The fate of microplastics >25 μm during treatment and their release to the environment was evaluated using an audit approach. The highest microplastic concentrations were detected in the influent, with fibres the dominant form of microplastic found. The screening and grit removal process preceding primary treatment removed 69–79% of microplastics, with these microplastics transported to landfill. Only 0.2–1.8% of the total microplastics in the influent were present in the final effluent, while 8–16% were retained in biosolids. This equates to between 22.1 × 106 to 133 × 106 microplastic particles per day released in effluent, between 864 × 106 to 1020 × 106 microplastic particles per day in biosolids, and between 4100 × 106 to 9100 × 106 microplastic particles per day transported to landfill. This study shows for the first time that most microplastics are retained during the initial screening and grit removal process with the load of microplastics going to landfill an order of magnitude greater than that in biosolids. Landfills may thus be an important sink (and potential future source) of microplastics from wastewater. Image 1 • An audit approach was applied to three WWTPs to evaluate microplastic fate. • Screening and grit removal removed up to 79% of microplastics entering the WWTP. • Removed microplastics transported to landfill, showing it is a microplastic sink. • Up to 2% and 16% of microplastics released in effluent and biosolids, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00456535
Volume :
263
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Chemosphere
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
147344760
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128294