Back to Search Start Over

Reliability-based overstrength factors of cross-laminated timber shear walls for seismic design.

Authors :
Aloisio, Angelo
Fragiacomo, Massimo
Source :
Engineering Structures. Feb2021, Vol. 228, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

• Reliability methods drive the assessment of overstrength ratios in Cross Laminated Timber structures. • There is a satisfactory agreement between the experimental lateral response of Cross-Laminated Timber panels and the simulations based on the Extended Energy-dependent Generalized Bouc-Wen model. • Given a certain failure probability, the overstrength factor is estimated as the ratio between the failure Peak Ground Acceleration of the ductile and brittle system. • The obtained overstrength ratios range between 1.5 and 2.5. • The obtained overstrength ratios are in accordance with those obtained by other scholars following non-probabilistic approaches. The ductile collapse mechanisms of structures should be less resistant than the brittle mechanisms to ensure a ductile seismic response: in this way, the ductile mechanisms activate before the brittle ones. This sort of chronological law of collapse is obtained in the design phase by providing a proper "overstrength" to the brittle mechanisms. The realization of overstrength plays a crucial role in the design, and several studies endeavoured to estimate the best overstrength factors, defined as the ratio between the characteristic load-carrying capacity of the non-ductile element and the characteristic load-carrying capacity of the ductile element. In this paper, the conventional definition of overstrength is discussed and compared to a probabilistic definition based on reliability methods. The probabilistic definition of overstrength drives the assessment of the overstrength factors of Cross-Laminated Timber buildings using a sort of indirect approach. The Extended-Energy dependent generalized Bouc-Wen model is used to estimate the nonlinear seismic response of a set of Cross-Laminated Timber shear walls with different ductility. The results are compared with the existing formulations, attempting to draw correlations possibly useful in the design phase. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01410296
Volume :
228
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Engineering Structures
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
147831021
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111547