Back to Search Start Over

Cytotoxicity and antigenotoxicity evaluation of acetylshikonin and shikonin.

Authors :
Figat, Ramona
Zgadzaj, Anna
Geschke, Sylwia
Sieczka, Patrycja
Pietrosiuk, Agnieszka
Sommer, Sylwester
Skrzypczak, Agata
Source :
Drug & Chemical Toxicology. Mar2021, Vol. 44 Issue 2, p140-147. 8p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Shikonin (SH) is used as a red pigment for food coloring and cosmetics, and has cytotoxic activity towards cancer cells. However, due to strong toxicity SH has limited potential as an anticancer drug. Acetylshikonin (ASH) is one of the SH derivatives with promising anticancer potential. In present study, we attempted to evaluate and compare the cytotoxicity of SH and ASH towards a normal cell line (V79) and in addition to evaluate their antigenotoxic activity. The evaluation was made with the use of the set of cytotoxicity assays with V79 line and the micronucleus test in vitro performed using clinafloxacin (CLFX), ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) as direct genotoxins and cyclophosphamide (CPA) as indirect genotoxin. For CPA and EMS the simultaneous protocol was used and for CLFX three different variants were performed: pretreatment, simultaneous, and post-treatment. A higher cytotoxic effect was observed for SH. The EC50 values obtained for SH were approximately twofold lower compared to that of ASH. Moreover, ASH exhibited an antigenotoxic potential against CPA-induced genotoxicity, whereas SH has no activity. However, ASH increased the EMS-induced genotoxicity, when SH exhibited no effect. Both compounds decreased the genotoxicity of CLFX in pretreatment and simultaneous protocol. Based on the results of the present study it can be concluded that ASH is less cytotoxic than SH to normal cells and has comparable antigenotoxic potential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01480545
Volume :
44
Issue :
2
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Drug & Chemical Toxicology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
147927003
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/01480545.2018.1536710