Nylon 6 and nylon 6,6 micro- and nanoplastics: A first example of their accurate quantification, along with polyester (PET), in wastewater treatment plant sludges.

A novel procedure for nylon 6 and nylon 6,6 polyamide (PAs) microplastics (MPs) quantification is described for the first time. The overall procedure, including quantification of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), was tested on wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) sludges. The three polymers account for the largest global share of synthetic textile microfibers, being possibly the most common MPs released upon laundering in urban wastewaters. Therefore, measuring their content in WWTP sludges may provide an accurate picture of the potential risks associated with both the inflow of these MPs in natural water bodies and the practice of using WWTP sludges as agricultural soil amendment. The novel procedure involves PAs depolymerization by acid hydrolysis followed by derivatization of the monomers 6-aminohexanoic acid (AHA) and hexamethylene diamine (HMDA) with a fluorophore. Reversed-phase HPLC analysis with fluorescence detection results in high sensitivities for both AHA (LOD = 8.85·10–4 mg/L, LOQ = 3.73·10–3 mg/L) and HMDA (LOD = 2.12·10–4, LOQ = 7.04·10–4 mg/L). PET quantification involves depolymerization, in this case by alkaline hydrolysis, followed by HPLC analysis of its comonomer terephthalic acid. Eight sludge samples from four WWTPs in Italy showed contamination in the 29.3–215.3 ppm and 10.6–134.6 ppm range for nylon 6 and nylon 6,6, respectively, and in the 520–1470 ppm range for PET. ga1 • The first analytical method for nylon 6 and nylon 6,6 polyamide (PAs) microplastics. • Overall method includes poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), nylon6, and nylon6,6. • PAs and PET are the most common textile microfibers polluting natural water bodies. • Contamination in complex matrices is measured with high accuracy and sensitivity. • Contamination by PET and PAs in wastewater treatment plant sludges was quantified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]