Back to Search Start Over

Comparative analysis of HFO-1234ze(E) and R-515B as low GWP alternatives to HFC-134a in moderately high temperature heat pumps.

Authors :
Mateu-Royo, Carlos
Mota-Babiloni, Adrián
Navarro-Esbrí, Joaquín
Barragán-Cervera, Ángel
Source :
International Journal of Refrigeration. Apr2021, Vol. 124, p197-206. 10p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

• HFO-1234ze(E) and R-515B are evaluated as low-GWP alternatives to HFC-134a. • An internal heat exchanger singularly benefits heating applications. • Heating production temperatures up to 90 °C are considered. • The alternative low-GWP refrigerants significantly reduces carbon emissions. • R-515B becomes a promising non-flammable alternative (A1) for heat pumps. This article provides a theoretical energy performance and carbon footprint analysis of the hydrofluoroolefin HFO-1234ze(E) and the mixture R-515B as low global warming potential (GWP) refrigerants to replace the hydrofluorocarbon HFC-134a in different heat pump applications. The reference configuration is a single-stage cycle with an internal heat exchanger (IHX). In this way, the impact of the IHX on medium and moderately high temperature heating applications has been investigated. HFO-1234ze(E) and R-515B result in approx. 25% lower heating capacity than HFC-134a due to a diminution of the latent heat of vaporisation and suction density. The heating capacity difference between HFO-1234ze(E) and R-515B remains below 2%. The heating coefficient of performance (COP) of the alternative low GWP refrigerants is comparable to that of the HFC-134a at the proposed conditions. The environmental analysis illustrates that HFO-1234ze(E) and R-515B can reduce down to 18% and 15%, respectively, the equivalent CO 2 emissions compared to HFC-134a in low-temperature space heating applications. In addition, this reduction arrive at 78% when compared to a natural gas boiler, considered as the conventional heating technology in moderately high temperature applications (domestic hot water, industrial processes, and radiators). Although HFO-1234ze(E) and R-515B present comparable energy and environmental performance, the latter refrigerant has an advantage in regard to installation safety requirements as a non-flammable refrigerant (A1). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01407007
Volume :
124
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
International Journal of Refrigeration
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
149177229
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2020.12.023