Back to Search Start Over

Effect of high-dose intravenous vitamin C on point-of-care blood glucose level in septic patients: a retrospective, single-center, observational case series.

Authors :
He, Juan
Zheng, Guanhao
Qian, Xian
Sheng, Huiqiu
Chen, Bing
Zhao, Bing
Chen, Erzhen
Mao, Enqiang
Bian, Xiaolan
Source :
Current Medical Research & Opinion. Apr2021, Vol. 37 Issue 4, p555-565. 11p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

High-dose vitamin C is an essential adjunctive drug for sepsis treatment. This study aimed to determine if high-dose vitamin C could lead to erroneous point-of-care glucose testing results. This retrospective, single-center, observational case series involved septic patients treated with high-dose vitamin C. We monitored their paired point-of-care glucose and laboratory glucose levels for statistical analysis. The glucose oxidase-peroxidase colorimetric method and hexokinase spectrophotometric method were applied for point-of-care glucose and laboratory glucose monitoring, respectively. Parkes Consensus Error Grid Analysis was used to assess the clinical influence of paired blood glucose values. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the effect of different vitamin C dosages and various renal function levels on point-of-care glucose readings. During a 3-year period, 82 eligible septic patients who accepted at least three days of high-dose vitamin C treatment were included in this study. Compliance with ISO15197:2013 criteria was met in 30 (36.59%) paired values, a proportion considerably lower than the minimum criteria for accuracy. Subgroup analysis showed that worse renal function or higher vitamin C dosage could lead to greater bias in point-of-care glucose readings; however, these inaccuracies rarely represented a clinical risk. High-dose intravenous ascorbate acid infusion may interfere with point-of-care glucose testing results. Thus, laboratory glucose measurements are recommended for more accurate results. Nonetheless, the inaccuracies magnitude of point-of-care glucose readings does not represent a significant clinical risk when physicians alter clinical action based on these results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03007995
Volume :
37
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Current Medical Research & Opinion
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
149454220
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2021.1887832