Back to Search Start Over

PET/MRI assessment of lung nodules in primary abdominal malignancies: sensitivity and outcome analysis.

Authors :
Biondetti, Pierpaolo
Vangel, Mark G.
Lahoud, Rita M.
Furtado, Felipe S.
Rosen, Bruce R.
Groshar, David
Canamaque, Lina G.
Umutlu, Lale
Zhang, Eric W.
Mahmood, Umar
Digumarthy, Subba R.
Shepard, Jo-Anne O.
Catalano, Onofrio A.
Source :
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging. Jun2021, Vol. 48 Issue 6, p1976-1986. 11p. 2 Color Photographs, 1 Diagram, 6 Charts, 1 Graph.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate PET/MR lung nodule detection compared to PET/CT or CT, to determine growth of nodules missed by PET/MR, and to investigate the impact of missed nodules on clinical management in primary abdominal malignancies. Methods: This retrospective IRB-approved study included [18F]-FDG PET/MR in 126 patients. All had standard of care chest imaging (SCI) with diagnostic chest CT or PET/CT within 6 weeks of PET/MR that served as standard of reference. Two radiologists assessed lung nodules (size, location, consistency, position, and [18F]-FDG avidity) on SCI and PET/MR. A side-by-side analysis of nodules on SCI and PET/MR was performed. The nodules missed on PET/MR were assessed on follow-up SCI to ascertain their growth (≥ 2 mm); their impact on management was also investigated. Results: A total of 505 nodules (mean 4 mm, range 1–23 mm) were detected by SCI in 89/126 patients (66M:60F, mean age 60 years). PET/MR detected 61 nodules for a sensitivity of 28.1% for patient and 12.1% for nodule, with higher sensitivity for > 7 mm nodules (< 30% and > 70% respectively, p < 0.05). 75/337 (22.3%) of the nodules missed on PET/MR (follow-up mean 736 days) demonstrated growth. In patients positive for nodules at SCI and negative at PET/MR, missed nodules did not influence patients' management. Conclusions: Sensitivity of lung nodule detection on PET/MR is affected by nodule size and is lower than SCI. 22.3% of missed nodules increased on follow-up likely representing metastases. Although this did not impact clinical management in study group with primary abdominal malignancy, largely composed of extra-thoracic advanced stage cancers, with possible different implications in patients without extra-thoracic spread. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16197070
Volume :
48
Issue :
6
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
150259842
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05113-1