Back to Search
Start Over
Contradictions and falling bridges: what was Wittgenstein's reply to Turing?
- Source :
-
British Journal for the History of Philosophy . May2021, Vol. 29 Issue 3, p537-559. 23p. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- In this paper, I offer a close reading of Wittgenstein's remarks on inconsistency, mostly as they appear in the Lectures on the Foundations of Mathematics. I focus especially on an objection to Wittgenstein's view given by Alan Turing, who attended the lectures, the so called 'falling bridges'-objection. Wittgenstein's position is that if contradictions arise in some practice of language, they are not necessarily fatal to that practice nor necessitate a revision of that practice. If we then assume that we have adopted a paraconsistent logic, Wittgenstein's answer to Turing is that if we run into trouble building our bridge, it is either because we have made a calculation mistake or our calculus does not actually describe the phenomenon it is intended to model. The possibility of either kind of error is not particular to contradictions nor to inconsistency, and thus contradictions do not have any special status as a thing to be avoided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- *CALCULUS
*PARADOX
*INCONSISTENCY (Logic)
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 09608788
- Volume :
- 29
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- British Journal for the History of Philosophy
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 150361610
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2020.1815646