Back to Search Start Over

Comprehensive comparison of multiple renewable power generation methods: A combination analysis of life cycle assessment and ecological footprint.

Authors :
Gao, Chengkang
Zhu, Sulong
An, Nan
Na, Hongming
You, Huan
Gao, Chengbo
Source :
Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. Sep2021, Vol. 147, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

As the goal of carbon neutrality has been proposed consecutively, renewable energy sources such as wind, solar, and bioenergy are gaining close attention in national strategic and sustainable development plans. Along with the development of renewable energy generation technologies, it is necessary to assess the environmental burden of renewable energy generation. This study analyzed the economic and environmental benefits of wind power, solar power, and biomass power generation methods over their life cycle. This paper comprehensively assessed and compared their environmental impacts based on a life cycle assessment (LCA) framework combined with ecological footprint analysis for the three renewable energy generation in China, and compared the results with those of thermal power generation to make strategic suggestions for the renewable energy power generation industry. The results show that: (1) wind power consumed the least energy, only 6.80 kJ/kW·h, and had the lowest emissions of CO 2 , SO 2 , NOx and CO and environmental impact potential. (2) Based on the ecological footprint analysis on the provincial level, only Anhui, Shandong and Jiangsu provinces showed ecological deficits, while the other provinces were in ecological surplus, mostly above 50% of their ecological areas. (3) Compared to thermal power generation, which consumed 1170.911 kJ/kW·h, wind power was the only one of the three renewable energy achieved a reduction in energy consumption. Wind power is currently the most efficient way of generating renewable energy. [Display omitted] • The environmental and economic benefits of wind power, solar photovoltaic power, and biomass power generation were assessed. • Life cycle assessment and ecological footprint were used as analytical methods. • Wind power generation is preferred to solar photovoltaic and biomass power generation. • Recommendations for the future development of the renewable energy generation industry are presented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13640321
Volume :
147
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
150818229
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111255