Optimizing the microscopic agglutination test (MAT) panel for the diagnosis of Leptospirosis in a low resource, hyper-endemic setting with varied microgeographic variation in reactivity.

The microscopic agglutination test (MAT) is the standard serological reference test for the diagnosis of leptospirosis, despite being a technically demanding and laborious procedure. The use of a locally optimised MAT panel is considered essential for proper performance and interpretation of results. This paper describes the procedure of selecting such an optimised panel for Sri Lanka, a country hyper-endemic for leptospirosis. MAT was performed using 24 strains on 1132 serum samples collected from patients presenting with acute undifferentiated fever. Of 24 strains, 15 were selected as the optimised panel, while only 11% of serum samples showed positivity. A geographical variation in predominantly reactive serovars was observed, whereas reactivity was low with the saprophytic strain Patoc. Testing with paired sera yielded a higher sensitivity but provided only a retrospective diagnosis. Serological tests based on ELISA with complimentary molecular diagnosis using PCR are a feasible and robust alternative approach to diagnose leptospirosis in countries having a higher burden of the disease. Author summary: Microscopic agglutination test is the most commonly used serological test in the diagnosis of leptospirosis. The test uses a live panel of Leptospira representing main serogroups and for proper performance of the test, an optimised panel which react well with patient samples need to be selected. This paper describes the procedure of selecting such an optimised panel for Sri Lanka which is a country hyper-endemic for leptospirosis. The test was done on serum samples collected from patients presented with acute undifferentiated fever with 24 panel of serogroups and 15 were selected as the optimised panel. The test was found to have a low sensitivity in the acute stage and ELISA based serological tests with molecular diagnosis using PCR assays would be a better way for diagnosis of leptospirosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]