Back to Search Start Over

Ultraviolet radiation transmission of soft disposable contact lenses and ISO 18369: claims and compliance.

Authors :
Jin, Irene
Tao, Fiona
Ho, Lily
Swarbrick, Helen A
Dain, Stephen J
Source :
Clinical & Experimental Optometry. Sep2021, Vol. 104 Issue 5, p579-582. 4p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

<bold>Clinical Relevance: </bold>This study was carried out to provide advice to eye care practitioners on those soft disposable contact lenses that comply with the Class 1 or Class 2 requirements of the international standard ISO 18369 for ultraviolet radiation protection.<bold>Background: </bold>This study was carried out to provide advice to eye care practitioners on those soft disposable contact lenses that comply with the Class 1 or Class 2 requirements of the international standard ISO 18369 for ultraviolet radiation (UVR) protection and to validate any claims made. It is intended to be used when a patient needs or requests UVR protection. A revised ISO 18369-3 was published in 2017. There is no Australian adoption nor equivalent.<bold>Methods: </bold>The direct spectral transmittance of three specimens of each of the twenty soft disposable contact lens types available in Australia in 2018 was measured in saline in a quartz cuvette with a dual beam spectrophotometer from 200-780 nm. Transmittance values for each material were averaged and scaled according to a single measurement of its transmittance in the visible spectrum (380-780 nm). Based on the ISO 18369-3:2017 criteria, lens materials were denoted as Class 1, Class 2 or non-UVR protectors. This classification was compared with any claim made by the manufacturer.<bold>Results: </bold>All claims of the manufacturers for Class 1 or Class 2 were valid. There were no examples of any missed opportunity to make a claim. Some claims were so general as to be untestable. Some numerical claims appeared to hide that only a Class 2 claim could be made.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Claims of Class 1 or Class 2 were found to be appropriate. There were no missed opportunities to claim. UV protection claims that were not in the ISO 18369-3 format may be taken as Class 2 compliance but not Class 1 compliance. A two-class system of UV protectors and non-UV protectors may serve practitioners and their patients better. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
08164622
Volume :
104
Issue :
5
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Clinical & Experimental Optometry
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
151189749
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2021.1878826