Cite
Comparison of four mobile, non‐invasive diagnostic techniques for differentiating glass types in historical leaded windows: MA‐XRF, UV–Vis–NIR, Raman spectroscopy and IRT.
MLA
Cagno, Simone, et al. “Comparison of Four Mobile, Non‐invasive Diagnostic Techniques for Differentiating Glass Types in Historical Leaded Windows: MA‐XRF, UV–Vis–NIR, Raman Spectroscopy and IRT.” XRS: X-Ray Spectrometry, vol. 50, no. 4, Aug. 2021, pp. 293–309. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.3185.
APA
Cagno, S., Van der Snickt, G., Legrand, S., Caen, J., Patin, M., Meulebroeck, W., Dirkx, Y., Hillen, M., Steenackers, G., Rousaki, A., Vandenabeele, P., & Janssens, K. (2021). Comparison of four mobile, non‐invasive diagnostic techniques for differentiating glass types in historical leaded windows: MA‐XRF, UV–Vis–NIR, Raman spectroscopy and IRT. XRS: X-Ray Spectrometry, 50(4), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.3185
Chicago
Cagno, Simone, Geert Van der Snickt, Stijn Legrand, Joost Caen, Mathilde Patin, Wendy Meulebroeck, Yarince Dirkx, et al. 2021. “Comparison of Four Mobile, Non‐invasive Diagnostic Techniques for Differentiating Glass Types in Historical Leaded Windows: MA‐XRF, UV–Vis–NIR, Raman Spectroscopy and IRT.” XRS: X-Ray Spectrometry 50 (4): 293–309. doi:10.1002/xrs.3185.