Benefit versus cost trade‐offs of masting across seed‐to‐seedling transition for a dominant subtropical forest species.

Masting is a common reproductive strategy regulating seedling regeneration in many perennial plant species. The evolutionary origins and functional benefits of masting have been explained by well‐supported hypotheses relating to economies of scale of seed production. Nevertheless, our understanding of the potential costs of masting for the plant seed‐to‐seedling transitions remains limited.We tracked the seed fate and documented changes in the seed spatial distribution patterns during the seed‐to‐seedling transition process of Castanopsis fargesii, a dominant species of subtropical evergreen broad‐leaved forests in China under natural conditions for more than 6 years.Masting resulted in a high proportion of seeds escaping predation by vertebrates and rodents, supporting the predator satiation hypothesis. However, it increased the pre‐dispersal seed predation by insects, and decreased the seed germination rate due to a negative effect on seed mass. This resulted in seed‐to‐seedling transition rates during mast years to be roughly half as much as during non‐mast years. In addition, masting negatively affected the spatial rearrangement of seeds, resulting in a spatial aggregative distribution pattern of newly germinated seedlings. The combined negative effects of smaller seeds and spatially aggregated seedlings reduced the survival rate of newly germinated seedlings at seedling establishment stage.Synthesis. Considering the whole seed‐to‐established seedling transition process, the benefits of masting on seedling recruitment due to the effective seed predator situation by vertebrates and rodents were decreased by the additional costs on seed mass, seed germination, seed spatial arrangement and seedling establishment. Our results highlight the importance of considering both the positive and negative effects of masting at each stage of the seed‐to‐seedling transition. Inferences based on seed predation and recruitment of newly germinated seedlings alone would lead to an overly optimistic conclusion about the benefits of masting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]