Back to Search Start Over

Reappraisal of SMAP inversion algorithms for soil moisture and vegetation optical depth.

Authors :
Gao, Lun
Ebtehaj, Ardeshir
Chaubell, Mario Julian
Sadeghi, Morteza
Li, Xiaojun
Wigneron, Jean-Pierre
Source :
Remote Sensing of Environment. Oct2021, Vol. 264, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

NASA's Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) satellite mission has been providing high-quality global estimates of soil moisture (SM) and vegetation optical depth (VOD) using L-band radiometry since 2015. To date, a variety of retrieval algorithms as well as surface roughness and scattering albedo have been developed. However, a comprehensive evaluation of different algorithms with the new surface parameters across diverse biomes, climates, and terrain slopes is lacking. To narrow down this knowledge gap, here we examine the performance of various existing algorithms, including V-pol Single Channel Algorithms (SCA-V), H-pol Single Channel Algorithms (SCA H), classic DCA, extended DCA (E -DCA), regularized DCA (RDCA), land parameter retrieval model (LPRM), multi-temporal DCA (MT-DCA), constrained multi-channel algorithm (CMCA), and spatially constrained multi-channel algorithm (S-CMCA). The SM estimates are evaluated against in-situ measurements from the International Soil Moisture Network (ISMN) while VOD estimates are compared with the two-band enhanced vegetation index (EVI2), tree height, and aboveground biomass. This study has led to several important findings: (1) The overall bias, root mean square error (RMSE), and unbiased RMSE (ubRMSE) of SM estimates from different algorithms generally increase with vegetation density while their temporal correlations with in-situ measurements decrease as the terrain slope increases. (2) The divergence between different SM estimates is relatively larger over forested areas than non-forested areas. (3) In terms of temporal correlation with in-situ measurements, the SCA-V and RDCA outperform other algorithms over most land cover types and climates. (4) SCA-H typically underestimates SM more compared to other algorithms across sparsely vegetated areas and most climates. (5) The ubRMSE values demonstrate that all algorithms have close performance when EVI2 is less than 0.3; however, the performance of classic DCA decays notably when EVI2 exceeds 0.3. (6) VOD retrievals from RDCA exhibit improved spatial correlations with EVI2, tree height, and aboveground biomass across the globe compared to other algorithms. Overall, RDCA exhibits a good compromise between the high performance of SM and VOD. • Performances of SM and VOD from nine algorithms are evaluated. • The overall bias, RMSE, ubRMSE of SM estimates increase with vegetation density. • The divergence between SM estimates is larger over forested areas than non-forested areas. • RDCA exhibits a good compromise between the high performance of SM and VOD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00344257
Volume :
264
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Remote Sensing of Environment
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
152041643
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112627