Back to Search Start Over

Development of the Pulmonary Hypertension Functional Classification Self-Report: a patient version adapted from the World Health Organization Functional Classification measure.

Authors :
Highland, Kristin B.
Crawford, Rebecca
Classi, Peter
Morrison, Ross
Doward, Lynda
Nelsen, Andrew C.
Castillo, Howard
Mathai, Stephen C.
DuBrock, Hilary M.
Source :
Health & Quality of Life Outcomes. 8/24/2021, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p1-13. 13p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is characterized by progressive limitations on physical activity, right heart failure, and premature death. The World Health Organization functional classification (WHO-FC) is a clinician-rated assessment used widely to assess PAH severity and functioning, but no equivalent patient-reported version of PAH symptoms and activity limitations exists. We developed a version of the WHO-FC for self-completion by patients: the Pulmonary Hypertension Functional Classification Self-Report (PH-FC-SR).<bold>Methods: </bold>Semistructured interviews were conducted with three health care providers (HCPs) via telephone to inform development of the draft PH-FC-SR. Two rounds of semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 US patients with a self-reported PAH diagnosis via telephone/online to elicit concepts and iteratively refine the PH-FC-SR.<bold>Results: </bold>HCPs reported that the WHO-FC was a useful tool for evaluating patients' PAH severity over time and for making treatment decisions but acknowledged that use of the measure is subjective. Patients in round 1 interviews (n = 6) reported PAH symptoms, including shortness of breath (n = 6), fatigue (n = 5), syncope (n = 5), chest pains (n = 3), and dizziness (n = 3). Round 1 patients identified challenges with the original WHO-FC, including comprehensibility of clinical terms and overlapping descriptions of class II and III, and preferred the Draft 1 PH-FC-SR over the original WHO-FC. After minor changes were made to Draft 2, round 2 interviews (n = 8) confirmed patients understood the PH-FC-SR class descriptions, interpreting them consistently.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>The HCP and patient interviews identified and confirmed certain limitations inherent within the clinician-rated WHO-FC, including subjective assessment and overlapping definitions for class II and III. The PH-FC-SR includes patient-appropriate language, symptoms, and physical activity impacts relevant to patients with PAH. Future research is recommended to validate the PH-FC-SR and explore its correlation with the physician-assessed WHO-FC and other outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14777525
Volume :
19
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Health & Quality of Life Outcomes
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
152056923
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01782-0