Back to Search Start Over

Large methane emission from freshwater aquaculture ponds revealed by long-term eddy covariance observation.

Authors :
Zhao, Jiayu
Zhang, Mi
Xiao, Wei
Jia, Lei
Zhang, Xiufang
Wang, Jiao
Zhang, Zhen
Xie, Yanhong
Pu, Yini
Liu, Shoudong
Feng, Zhaozhong
Lee, Xuhui
Source :
Agricultural & Forest Meteorology. Oct2021, Vol. 308, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

• Methane fluxes from freshwater aquaculture ponds were measured using eddy covariance. • Ebullition was the main transport way accounting for 70%±4% of the total CH 4 flux. • Water temperature was the primary driver of the CH 4 flux across multiple time scales. • Large spatial variations were observed in the total and ebullitive CH 4 flux with the FC and IF method. • Dredging plays a more important role in regulating the CH 4 emission than aeration. Aquaculture ponds are important anthropogenic methane (CH 4) sources to the atmosphere. Currently large uncertainties still remain regarding the emission strength of this source type and its relationship with aquacultural farming practices. In this study, the methane flux was measured continuously for four years with eddy covariance (EC) in an aquaculture pond complex in the Yangtze River Delta, China. These ponds have never been dredged and were aerated during part of the aquacultural season. Additionally, floating chambers and inverted funnels were used to investigate spatial heterogeneity of the CH 4 flux and to quantify the contribution via ebullition to the flux. The results showed that the daily CH 4 flux ranged from 0.1 to 16.7 μg m−2 s−1, with an average value of 4.10 ± 3.08 µg m−2 s−1. Water temperature was the primary driver of the CH 4 flux across multiple time scales (half-hourly, daily, and monthly scale). Ebullition was the main transport way accounting for 70% ± 4% of the total CH 4 flux. The annual flux in this study was about three times the median flux reported by other researchers for similar freshwater aquaculture ponds. A statistical analysis of our data together with the published flux data reveals that ponds with dredging have much lower CH 4 emission flux than those without dredging and suggests that dredging may have a much larger influence on the emission flux than aeration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01681923
Volume :
308
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Agricultural & Forest Meteorology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
152271853
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108600