Consistent and diverse multi-View subspace clustering with structure constraint.

• An exclusivity term is introduced to enforce the diversity of different views. • Multi-view subspace representation is constrained to find the cluster structure. • An effective optimization algorithm is proposed to solve the objective function. • Experiments demonstrate that our algorithm outperforms state-of-the-art approaches. Multi-view subspace clustering algorithms have recently been developed to process multi-view dataset clustering by accurately depicting the essential characteristics of multi-view data. Most existing methods focus on conduct self-representation property using a consistent representation and a set of specific representations with well-designed regularization to learn the common and specific knowledge among different views. However, specific representations only contain the unique information of each individual view, which limits their ability to fully excavate the diversity of multi-view data to enhance the complementarity among different views. Moreover, when conducting multi-view subspace clustering, the learned subspace self-representation and clustering are sequential and independent, which lacks consideration of the interaction between representation learning and the final clustering calculation. In this paper, a novel method termed consistent and diverse multi-view subspace clustering with structure constraint (CDMSC 2) is proposed to overcome the above-described deficiencies. (1) An exclusivity constraint term is employed to enhance the diversity of specific representations among different views for modeling consistency and diversity in a unified framework. (2) A clustering structure constraint is imposed on the subspace self-representation by factorizing the learned subspace self-representation into the cluster centroids and the cluster assignments with the goal of obtaining a clustering-oriented subspace self-representation. In addition, we carefully designed an efficient optimization algorithm to solve the objective function through relaxation and alternating minimization. Extensive experiments on five benchmark datasets in terms of six evaluation metrics demonstrate that our method outperforms the state-of-the-art methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]