Back to Search Start Over

Comparison Of U.S. Navy's Body Fat Circumference Equation With Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry.

Authors :
McClintock, Rebecca
Weller, Rebecca
Jones, Douglas
Laird, Melissa
Hodgdon, James
Heaney, Jay
Source :
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2021 Supplement, Vol. 53 Issue 8S, p19-19. 1/4p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

The introduction of the Physical Fitness Assessment (PFA) in 1981 provided the U.S. Navy with a tool to evaluate a sailor's overall health and fitness. The PFA is composed of a body composition assessment (BCA) and a Physical Readiness Test. A circumference measurement (CIRC) technique was selected for the BCA to ensure minimal logistics, cost, equipment, and training for fleetwide implementation. In 1984, the Naval Heath Research Center developed gender-specific CIRC equations based on male and female sailor anthropometry and cross-validated them using percent body fat (%BF) from hydrostatic weighing as the gold standard. Accuracy of these equations was supported by a correlation coefficient r = 0.90 and standard error of measurement (SEM) of 2.7 %BF units for men, and r = 0.85 correlation and SEM of 3.7% BF for women. Currently, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is more commonly used as a criterion for BCA. PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of the Navy's BCA using circumference measurements to estimate %BF by comparing it with the current criterion using DXA. METHODS: One hundred two (n = 102) active duty sailors (51 male, 51 female) had CIRC %BF measured and then completed a DXA %BF scan. CIRC was measured at the neck and abdomen II (level of the umbilicus) for men, and the neck, abdomen I (minimal waist indentation), and hip sites for women. Height, weight, and age were also obtained from all participants. Pearson product-moment correlation was used to determine the strength of association between CIRC and DXA. RESULTS: Mean ± SD %BF for CIRC versus DXA was 21.9 ± 0.6 and 21.6 ± 0.7%, respectively, for men, and 36.1 ± 1.1 and 32.6 ± 1.0%, respectively, for women. A strong association was found between CIRC and DXA, r = 0.80 (SEM = 2.1 %BF) for men and r = 0.91 (SEM = 2.3 %BF) for women. These values are within the range established when the Navy equation was developed comparing circumferences and hydrostatic weighing. CONCLUSIONS: Correlation and SEM values obtained between CIRC and DXA for both male and female sailors were comparable to similar analyses with hydrostatic weighing. These results indicate that when DXA is used as the criterion, the current Navy circumference equations used to estimate body fat percentage are still accurate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01959131
Volume :
53
Issue :
8S
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
152581509
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000759248.98400.96