Back to Search Start Over

Factors Affecting Route Selection of Balloon-Assisted Enteroscopy in Patients with Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A KASID Multicenter Study.

Authors :
Baek, Dong Hoon
Hwang, Seonyeong
Eun, Chang Soo
Jeon, Seong Ran
Kim, Jinsu
Kim, Eun Ran
Yang, Dong-Hoon
Jang, Hyun Joo
Im, Jong Pil
Park, Soo Jung
Jung, Sung Hoon
Source :
Diagnostics (2075-4418). Oct2021, Vol. 11 Issue 10, p1860-1860. 1p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) is an important diagnostic modality for ongoing obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). However, it is difficult to determine the optimal insertion route. We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients with OGIB contained in a multicenter enteroscopy database of 1108 balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) procedures (875 patients) to find out factors affecting BAE route selection in patients with OGIB. A total of 603 BAE procedures in 512 patients were investigated: there were 392 (65.0%) bidirectional and 211 (35.0%) unidirectional procedures. Overt OGIB was more frequent in the latter group (p = 0.024). Computed tomography (CT) was more frequently performed in the unidirectional group (p < 0.001). Capsule endoscopy and a small bowel barium study were performed more frequently in the bidirectional group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.039, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that occult OGIB, capsule endoscopy and a small bowel barium study were independently associated with use of the bidirectional approach (p = 0.011, p = 0.013 and p = 0.046, respectively). Conversely, CT was associated with use of the unidirectional approach (p < 0.001). Conclusion: CT can aid the selection of an optimal insertion route in OGIB patients. However, capsule endoscopy and small bowel barium study are unhelpful. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20754418
Volume :
11
Issue :
10
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Diagnostics (2075-4418)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
153250073
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11101860