Multi-objective jellyfish search optimizer for efficient power system operation based on multi-dimensional OPF framework.

An enhanced multi-objective Quasi-Reflected Jellyfish Search Optimizer (MOQRJFS) is presented in this article for solving multi-dimensional Optimal Power Flow (MDOPF) issue with diverse objectives which display the minimization of economic fuel cost, total emissions, and the active power loss with satisfying operational constraints. Despite the simple structure of JFS with control of exploitation and exploration, searching capability of the JFS requires more support. Hence, two modifications are performed on the standard JFS algorithm. The first modification is that a cluster with a random size has been proposed which illustrates the social community that can share the data in the cluster and are dissimilar from one to another. The second modification is that a quasi-opposition-based learning is emerged in JFS to support the exploration phase. As selection criteria for the best solutions, a fuzzy decision-making strategy is joint into MOQRJFS optimizer. Additionally, the Pareto optimality concept is added to extract the non-dominated solutions. The superiority of the MOQRJFS is proved throughout application on IEEE 30-bus system, IEEE 57-bus system, the West Delta Region System of 52 bus (WDRS-52) in Egypt, and a large scale 118-bus system. Thirteen cases with economic, environmental, and technical objectives of MDOPF are included in this study. The outcomes of the proposed MOQRJFS have been compared with the conventional MOJFS and the reported techniques in the literature. It is clearly observed that the MOQRJFS give the minimum values compared with these techniques which reveals its robustness, effectiveness, and superiority when handling MDOPF among other techniques. • An enhanced multi-objective Quasi-Reflected Jellyfish Search Optimizer is presented. • Two modifications are performed on the standard JFS algorithm. • The superiority is proved on four test systems. • Thirteen cases with economic, environmental, and technical objectives are considered. • The outcomes of the proposed optimizer have been compared with others. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]