Cite
Are we better off using multiple endometriosis classifications in imaging and surgery than settle for one universal less than perfect protocol? Review of staging systems in ultrasound, magnetic resonance and surgery.
MLA
Indrielle-Kelly, Tereza, et al. “Are We Better off Using Multiple Endometriosis Classifications in Imaging and Surgery than Settle for One Universal Less than Perfect Protocol? Review of Staging Systems in Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance and Surgery.” Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 42, no. 1, Jan. 2022, pp. 10–16. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2021.1887111.
APA
Indrielle-Kelly, T., Fanta, M., Frühauf, F., Burgetová, A., Cibula, D., & Fischerová, D. (2022). Are we better off using multiple endometriosis classifications in imaging and surgery than settle for one universal less than perfect protocol? Review of staging systems in ultrasound, magnetic resonance and surgery. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 42(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2021.1887111
Chicago
Indrielle-Kelly, Tereza, Michael Fanta, Filip Frühauf, Andrea Burgetová, David Cibula, and Daniela Fischerová. 2022. “Are We Better off Using Multiple Endometriosis Classifications in Imaging and Surgery than Settle for One Universal Less than Perfect Protocol? Review of Staging Systems in Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance and Surgery.” Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 42 (1): 10–16. doi:10.1080/01443615.2021.1887111.