Cite
Efficiency comparison with fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling and complete internal limiting membrane peeling for treating myopic traction maculopathy.
MLA
Xin, Wen-Jian, et al. “Efficiency Comparison with Fovea-Sparing Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Complete Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Treating Myopic Traction Maculopathy.” Graefe’s Archive of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 260, no. 1, Jan. 2022, pp. 73–81. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05320-y.
APA
Xin, W.-J., Jiang, J.-Z., Ji, L.-B., Lv, W.-J., Gu, Y.-X., & Xiao, Y. (2022). Efficiency comparison with fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling and complete internal limiting membrane peeling for treating myopic traction maculopathy. Graefe’s Archive of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, 260(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05320-y
Chicago
Xin, Wen-Jian, Ji-Ze Jiang, Lei-Bing Ji, Wen-Juan Lv, Yong-Xin Gu, and Yun Xiao. 2022. “Efficiency Comparison with Fovea-Sparing Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Complete Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Treating Myopic Traction Maculopathy.” Graefe’s Archive of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology 260 (1): 73–81. doi:10.1007/s00417-021-05320-y.