Postprocessing of hydrometeorological ensemble forecasts based on multisource precipitation in Ganjiang River basin, China.

• An integrated postprocessing framework for hydrometeorological ensemble is developed. • The canonical event considered observed precipitation improves the forecast accuracy. • The streamflow simulation can benefit from the seamless hydrologic prediction. • The Bayesian method improves the forecast effect than a single hydrological model. Flood forecasting is a challenging task with major concerns that include forecast uncertainty and lead time. This paper aims to comprehensively address the data correction issue for hydrological models by developing an integrated postprocessing framework for hydrometeorological ensemble forecasts based on three types of ensemble precipitation forecasts (ECMWF, GEFS, and CFSv2). This framework mainly comprises the Ensemble Preprocessor (EPP) and the Bayesian model averaging (BMA) scheme: (1) the EPP eliminates various deviations from the ensemble precipitation forecasts, with the canonical event model extracting useful predictive information and extending the lead time by linking the forecasts seamlessly, and (2) the BMA scheme develops more skillful and reliable probabilistic hydrological forecasts from ensemble streamflow forecasts generated by three hydrological models (XAJ, VIC and DTVGM) driven by the postprocessed ensemble precipitation forecasts. The Ganjiang River Basin was selected as a case study to examine the capacity and efficiency of our developed framework. We found that the performance of the integrated postprocessing of hydrometeorological ensemble forecasts benefitted from a reasonable design of canonical events, especially when the observed precipitation was factored into the canonical events. Streamflow forecasts with increased lead times and accuracy were obtained by employing postprocessed precipitation forecasts instead of raw forecasts as the input for the hydrological models. We also found that the BMA scheme further improved the forecast effect by generating more skillful and reliable forecasts than a single hydrological model, which was verified by a series of statistical indices and uncertainty analysis. Our results underscore the importance of considering both input and output for hydrological models in hydrological forecasting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]