Pre-collisional crustal evolution of the European Variscan periphery: Constraints from detrital zircon U–Pb ages and Hf isotopic record in the Precambrian metasedimentary basement of the Brunovistulian Domain.

[Display omitted] • Contrasting detrital zircon age and Hf isotopic patterns of Brunovistulian basement. • Rodinia internal or peripheral position and Baltica/Amazonia sources in Tonian. • Ediacaran deposition in a back-arc basin with active magmatic arc dominant source. • Transition from Rodinia formation/break-up to Gondwana or Baltica active margin. • Model of the Bohemian Massif as a single Neoproterozoic crustal domain. In this study, U–Pb ages and Hf isotopic composition of detrital zircons from the Precambrian metasedimentary autochthon of the Brunovistulian Domain in the eastern Bohemian Massif were investigated to understand the pre-collisional evolution of the eastern periphery of the European Variscan belt. Detrital zircons of the Tonian sequences have mostly Paleoproterozoic to Neoproterozoic ages (c. 2.1–0.9 Ga) and are interpreted as detritus derived from the basement of either Baltica or Amazonia. The mostly positive ε Hf(t) values (–4 to + 16) indicate a juvenile nature of their magma sources with minor older crustal components. In contrast, the Ediacaran sequences contain dominantly Neoproterozoic zircons (c. 600 Ma) and only rare Paleo- and Mesoproterozoic ages indicate that they were sourced from the adjacent Neoproterozoic magmatic arc with very limited input of recycled cratonic detritus. The large spread of ε Hf(t) values (–15 to + 13) of the Neoproterozoic zircons suggests significant mixing of mantle-derived magmas with mature crustal material, typical of large continental magmatic arc systems. The zircon age patterns of the Ediacaran sequences, characterized by a dominance of the late Neoproterozoic zircons and limited Mesoproterozoic zircons, are nearly identical to those from the Teplá–Barrandian Unit and Moldanubian Zone, pointing to their similar sources. We consider such age populations as a record of sources actually exposed at the time of deposition, rather than the real provenance signature of the continental basement. The change in detrital zircon U–Pb age and Hf record of the Brunovistulian Domain took place between the early and late Neoproteorozoic, and probably reflects the plate-tectonic reconfiguration from the Rodinia formation/break-up to the evolution of the Gondwana or Baltica active margins. Our data challenge the main arguments for an existence of the Rheic oceanic suture between the Brunovistulian Domain and Moldanubian Zone and allow for an alternative pre-collisional model of the Bohemian Massif as a single Neoproterozoic crustal domain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]