Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of the PROMIS Preference Score (PROPr) and EQ-5D-5L Index Value in General Population Samples in the United Kingdom, France, and Germany.

Authors :
Klapproth, Christoph Paul
Sidey-Gibbons, Christopher J.
Valderas, José Martinez
Rose, Matthias
Fischer, Felix
Source :
Value in Health. May2022, Vol. 25 Issue 5, p824-834. 11p.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

<bold>Objectives: </bold>The Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Preference score (PROPr) can be used to assess health state utility (HSU) and estimate quality-adjusted life-years in cost-effectiveness analyses. It is based on item response theory and promises to overcome limitations of existing HSU scores such as ceiling effects. The PROPr contains 7 PROMIS domains: cognitive abilities, depression, fatigue, pain, physical function, sleep disturbance, and ability to participate in social roles and activities. We aimed to compare the PROPr with the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) in terms of psychometric properties using data from 3 countries.<bold>Methods: </bold>We collected PROMIS-29 profile and EQ-5D-5L data from 3 general population samples (United Kingdom = 1509, France = 1501, Germany = 1502). Given that cognition is not assessed by the PROMIS-29, it was predicted by the recommended linear regression model. We compared the convergent validity, known-groups construct validity, and ceiling and floor effects of the PROPr and EQ-5D-5L.<bold>Results: </bold>The mean PROPr (0.48, 0.53, 0.48; P<.01) and EQ-5D-5L scores (0.82, 0.85, 0.83; P<.01) showed significant differences of similar magnitudes (d = 0.34; d = 0.32; d = 0.35; P<.01) across all samples. The differences were invariant to sex, income, occupation, education, and most conditions but not for age. The Pearson correlation coefficients between both scores were r = 0.74, r = 0.69, and r = 0.72. PROPr's ceiling and floor effects both were minor to moderate. The EQ-5D-5L's ceiling (floor) effects were major (negligible).<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Both the EQ-5D-5L and the PROPr assessed by the PROMIS-29 show high validity. The PROPr yields considerably lower HSU values than the EQ-5D-5L. Consequences for quality-adjusted life-year measurements should be investigated in future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10983015
Volume :
25
Issue :
5
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Value in Health
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
156519656
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2021.10.012