Temporal and region‐specific variations in genome‐wide inbreeding effects on female size and reproduction traits of rainbow trout.

Recent studies have shown that current levels of inbreeding, estimated by runs of homozygosity (ROH), are moderate to high in farmed rainbow trout lines. Based on ROH metrics, the aims of our study were to (i) quantify inbreeding effects on female size (postspawning body weight, fork length) and reproduction traits (spawning date, coelomic fluid weight, spawn weight, egg number, average egg weight) in rainbow trout, and (ii) identify both the genomic regions and inbreeding events affecting performance. We analysed the performance of 1346 females under linear animal models including random additive and dominance genetics effects, with fixed covariates accounting for inbreeding effects at different temporal and genomic scales. A significant effect of genome‐wide inbreeding (F) was only observed for spawning date and egg weight, with performance variations of +12.3% and −3.8%, respectively, for 0.1 unit increase in F level. At different local genomic scales, we observed highly variable inbreeding effects on the seven traits under study, ranging from increasing to decreasing trait values. As widely reported in the literature, the main scenario observed during this study was a negative impact of recent inbreeding. However, other scenarios such as positive effects of recent inbreeding or negative impacts of old inbreeding were also observed. Although partial dominance appeared to be the main hypothesis explaining inbreeding depression for all the traits studied, the overdominance hypothesis might also play a significant role in inbreeding depression affecting fecundity (egg number and mass) traits in rainbow trout. These findings suggest that region‐specific inbreeding can strongly impact performance without necessarily observing genome‐wide inbreeding effects. They shed light on the genetic architecture of inbreeding depression and its evolution along the genome over time. The use of region‐specific metrics may enable breeders to more accurately manage the trade‐off between genetic merit and the undesirable side effects associated with inbreeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]