Cite
In Revision THA, Is the Re-revision Risk for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Greater in Dual-mobility Constructs or Large Femoral Head Bearings? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
MLA
Hoskins, Wayne, et al. “In Revision THA, Is the Re-Revision Risk for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Greater in Dual-Mobility Constructs or Large Femoral Head Bearings? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.” Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research®, vol. 480, no. 6, June 2022, pp. 1091–101. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000002085.
APA
Hoskins, W., Rainbird, S., Dyer, C., Graves, S. E., & Bingham, R. (2022). In Revision THA, Is the Re-revision Risk for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Greater in Dual-mobility Constructs or Large Femoral Head Bearings? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research®, 480(6), 1091–1101. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000002085
Chicago
Hoskins, Wayne, Sophia Rainbird, Chelsea Dyer, Stephen E. Graves, and Roger Bingham. 2022. “In Revision THA, Is the Re-Revision Risk for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Greater in Dual-Mobility Constructs or Large Femoral Head Bearings? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.” Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research® 480 (6): 1091–1101. doi:10.1097/CORR.0000000000002085.