Back to Search Start Over

Economic evaluation of prevention of cystoid macular edema after cataract surgery in diabetic patients: ESCRS PREMED study report 6.

Authors :
Simons, Rob W.P.
Wielders, Laura H.P.
Nuijts, Rudy M.M.A.
Veldhuizen, Claudette A.
van den Biggelaar, Frank J.H.M.
Winkens, Bjorn
Schouten, Jan S.A.G.
Dirksen, Carmen D.
Source :
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. May2022, Vol. 48 Issue 5, p555-563. 9p.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

The ESCRS PREMED study showed that perioperative subconjunctival triamcinolone acetonide was effective in prevention of pseudophakic cystoid macular edema in diabetic patients. This study confirmed that it is also cost-effective. Purpose: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic treatments against cystoid macular edema after cataract surgery in diabetic patients. Setting: 7 ophthalmology clinics in the Netherlands and Belgium. Design: Prospective trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis using data from a European multicenter randomized clinical trial. Methods: Diabetic patients (n = 163) undergoing uneventful cataract surgery were randomized to perioperative subconjunctival triamcinolone acetonide (n = 36), perioperative intravitreal bevacizumab (n = 36), combination treatment (n = 45), or no additional treatment (control group, n = 46). The cost analysis was performed from a healthcare perspective within a 12-week postoperative time horizon. The main effectiveness outcome was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The main cost-effectiveness outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER; cost per QALY). Results: The mean total healthcare costs and QALYs were as follows: triamcinolone group €1827 (U.S. dollars [$] 2295)/0.166; bevacizumab group €2050 ($2575)/0.144; combination group €2027 ($2546)/0.166; and control group €2041 ($2564)/0.156. Bevacizumab and control treatment were most costly and least effective. The ICER was €321 984 ($404 503) per QALY for the combination group compared with that of the triamcinolone group. Assuming the willingness-to-pay as €20 000 ($25 126) per QALY, the cost-effectiveness probability was 70% and 23% in the triamcinolone and combination groups, respectively. No patient who received triamcinolone developed clinically significant macular edema (CSME). A secondary cost-effectiveness analysis based on this outcome showed a clear preference for triamcinolone. Conclusions: In diabetic patients, subconjunctival triamcinolone was effective in preventing CSME after cataract surgery. The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that triamcinolone is also cost-effective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
08863350
Volume :
48
Issue :
5
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
157463395
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000785