¿Naturalismo versus teísmo? La polémica Diéguez-Soler.

This article analyses the three axes of the debate between Antonio Diéguez Lucena and Francisco José Soler Gil that occurred some years ago: i) mental causation and its possible explanation in a naturalistic key, ii) the merits and explanatory limits of a possible theistic alternative, and iii) the convenience of a naturalistic methodology in philosophy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]