PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEREMPUAN TENTANG HARTA BERSAMA.

Backround: The Religious Courts are one of the judicial powers as an effective means to realize access and control over material and non-material rights that are equal and gender-just. Purpose: This study aims to determine the legal considerations in the Decisions of the Pulang Pisau Religious Court Number 82/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Pps and Number 19/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Pps with justice and gender. Method: This research is a descriptive and deductive research. The deductive method is used to discuss a general problem leading to a specific discussion. The data analysis technique used in this study is a qualitative descriptive method, which is an analysis used to describe in words or sentences separated by category to get conclusions. Results: The results of this study conclude that Legal Protection Against Women in the Decisions of the Pulang Pisau Religious Court Number 82/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Pps and Number 19/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Pps From Juridical Review Aspects in Relation to Justice and Gender Equality. Conclusion: The mediation process is not yet gender friendly, the two guidelines for adjudicating women's cases in conflict with the law have not been implemented by the panel of judges, the three judges' Ijtihad have not taken sides with justice and gender equality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]