A comparison of using organic Rankine and Kalina cycles as bottom cycles in a solar‐powered steam Rankine cycle.

This study has attempted to compare two thermodynamic cascade cycles, which in this paper are presented as Systems A and B. System A was consisted of a steam Rankine cycle (SRC) as a top cycle and an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) as a bottom cycle. System B was consisted of the same SRC as the top cycle and a Kalina cycle as the bottom cycle. The comparison of both systems has been made by changing a number of parameters. The chosen parameters for this comparison were bottom cycle mass flow rate, aperture area of the collector, top cycle condensing pressure, and bottom cycle turbine inlet and outlet pressures. Also, a short economic evaluation has been made between two proposed cascade cycles (Systems A and B). The result indicated that the Kalina cycle shows superiority over the ORC as the bottom cycle in a solar‐driven SRC. Furthermore, it was determined that the most effective parameters on the overall efficiency of the systems are the condensing pressure of the top cycle and the outlet pressure of the bottom cycle turbine. Also, among the chosen parameters, the outlet pressure of the bottom cycle turbine had the highest effect on the efficiency of the bottom cycles. Considering the economic aspect, the results showed that the levelized costs of energy for both systems are quite equal at 0.011 ($/kWh). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]