Applicability of cross‐property differential effective medium model to the joint elastic–electrical properties of reservoir sandstones.

Joint seismic and controlled‐source electromagnetic surveys can reduce uncertainty and improve hydrocarbon quantification. However, the successful interpretation of joint seismic and controlled‐source electromagnetic survey data requires a valid rock physics model to link the elastic and electrical rock properties. A cross‐property differential effective medium is recently proposed with pores embedded in the mineral matrix. We have presented a technique to test the applicability of the cross‐property differential effective medium model to the joint elastic‐electrical properties of reservoir sandstones. The method is based on the common employment of measured sample porosity and inverted equivalent pore aspect ratio from cementation exponent for the modelling. Application of the modelling approach to a laboratory joint elastic‐electrical dataset shows that there is a systematic discrepancy in the modelled and measured joint elastic–electrical properties. It is also found that an equivalent pore aspect ratio is existing to reasonably predict the trend of the joint elastic–electrical data; however, the porosity used in the modelling is far from their measured values. Conversely, if the measured sample porosity is employed, the mentioned equivalent pore aspect ratio fails to fit either of the measured elastic and electrical rock properties. The results indicate the incapability of the cross‐property differential effective medium model for the joint elastic–electrical modelling of reservoir rocks and suggest the requirement of a new model to link the elastic and electrical properties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]