When papers go bad — part II.

Part II. Focuses on what needs to be done about bad papers about cell science research. Journal club members' task for reviewers to evaluate a paper; Problem of the generation of data in a few days rather than months or years of research; Tips for members on the reading of a paper; Use of the abstract to get an idea of what the researcher want to conclude; Decision on whether the experiments that were really done prove the points in a manner that allows the integration of results and the conclusion.