Back to Search Start Over

Automated clinical decision support system with deep learning dose prediction and NTCP models to evaluate treatment complications in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors :
Draguet, Camille
Barragán-Montero, Ana M.
Vera, Macarena Chocan
Thomas, Melissa
Populaire, Pieter
Defraene, Gilles
Haustermans, Karin
Lee, John A.
Sterpin, Edmond
Source :
Radiotherapy & Oncology. Nov2022, Vol. 176, p101-107. 7p.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

• Deep learning (DL) is used to predict the radiotherapy dose in esophageal cancer. • This study elaborates an automated tool combining DL models and NTCP models. • The automated model-based approach redirects esophageal cancer patients to PT. • The automated tool succeeds in predicting which patients should be referred to PT. This study aims to investigate how accurate our deep learning (DL) dose prediction models for intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and pencil beam scanning (PBS) treatments, when chained with normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models, are at identifying esophageal cancer patients who are at high risk of toxicity and should be switched to proton therapy (PT). Two U-Net were created, for photon (XT) and proton (PT) plans, respectively. To estimate the dose distribution for each patient, they were trained on a database of 40 uniformly planned patients using cross validation and a circulating test set. These models were combined with a NTCP model for postoperative pulmonary complications. The NTCP model used the mean lung dose, age, histology type, and body mass index as predicting variables. The treatment choice is then done by using a ΔNTCP threshold between XT and PT plans. Patients with ΔNTCP ≥ 10% were referred to PT. Our DL models succeed in predicting dose distributions with a mean error on the mean dose to the lungs (MLD) of 1.14 ± 0.93% for XT and 0.66 ± 0.48% for PT. The complete automated workflow (DL chained with NTCP) achieved 100% accuracy in patient referral. The average residual (ΔNTCP ground truth - ΔNTCP predicted) is 1.43 ± 1.49%. This study evaluates our DL dose prediction models in a broader patient referral context and demonstrates their ability to support clinical decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01678140
Volume :
176
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Radiotherapy & Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
160437576
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2022.08.031