Effects of blending methane, propane, and propylene on soot evolution in ethylene diffusion flames based on optical diagnostics.

• Flame temperature and soot characteristics are measured via optical diagnostics. • Adding propylene causes the transition from a non-smoking flame to a smoking flame. • The synergistic effect on soot particle diameter is found when blending propane. • Earlier inception time and longer growth time account for the synergistic effect. Soot evolution of the ethylene-based laminar coflow diffusion flame doping with methane, propane, and propylene with the blending ratio ranging from 0 to 50% has been investigated experimentally. These fuels were selected for their different fuel structure. Spatially resolved distribution maps of the flame temperature, soot volume fraction, the fluorescence signals of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and primary soot particle diameter and number density were determined utilizing laser-induced incandescence (LII), laser-induced fluorescence (LIF), and ratio pyrometry (RP). It was found that the flame height surged and the flame temperature dropped dramatically when the propylene blending ratio was 20% while they were almost constant with the increasing addition of methane or propane. The soot/PAHs loading decreased monotonically with the addition of methane and the opposite was true in the cases of blending propylene. The synergistic effect of mixing propane into ethylene was found on both the soot/PAHs loading. The same trends were observed in the percentage of carbon conversion to soot and the primary soot particle diameter. It can be seen from the soot evolution analysis that methane addition suppressed the soot nucleation and surface growth simultaneously. The enhanced soot surface growth for the flames doping with propane at a low addition level and for the whole flame sets doping with propylene were attributed to the earlier inception time and the longer mass growth time. The preferential diffusion and weakened oxidation of soot particles because of the decreased flame temperature perhaps accounted for the transition from a non-smoking flame to a smoking flame when the propylene blending ratio was greater than 40%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]