Back to Search Start Over

"After viral load testing, I get my results so I get to know which path my life is taking me": qualitative insights on routine centralized and point-of-care viral load testing in western Kenya from the Opt4Kids and Opt4Mamas studies.

Authors :
Qian, Shirley Rui W.
Hassan, Shukri A.
Scallon, Andrea J.
Oyaro, Patrick
Brown, Evelyn
Wagude, James
Mukui, Irene
Kinywa, Eunice
Oluoch, Frederick
Odhiambo, Francesca
Oyaro, Boaz
Kingwara, Leonard
Yongo, Nashon
Karauki, Enericah
Gao, Jody
Otieno, Lindah
John-Stewart, Grace C.
Abuogi, Lisa L.
Patel, Rena C.
Source :
BMC Health Services Research. 12/17/2022, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p1-14. 14p. 4 Charts.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: Viral suppression (VS) is a marker of effective HIV therapy, and viral load (VL) testing is critical for treatment monitoring, especially in high-risk groups such as children and pregnant/postpartum women. Although routine VL testing, via centralized laboratory networks, was implemented in Kenya starting in 2014, optimization and sustainable scale up of VL testing are still needed. Methods: We conducted a mixed methods study to evaluate the impact of higher frequency, point-of-care (POC) VL testing in optimizing VS among children and pregnant/postpartum women on antiretroviral treatment (ART) in five HIV treatment facilities in western Kenya in the Opt4Kids and Opt4Mamas studies. We conducted 68 key informant interviews (KIIs) from December 2019 to December 2020 with children and pregnant women living with HIV, child caregivers, providers, laboratory/facility leadership, and county- or national-level policymakers. Our KII guide covered the following domains: (1) barriers and facilitators to ART use and VS, (2) literacy and experiences with VL in routine care and via study, and (3) opinions on how to scale up VL testing for optimal programmatic use. We used inductive coding and thematic analysis to identify dominant themes with convergent and divergent subthemes. Results: Three main themes regarding VL testing emerged from our analysis. (1) Key informants uniformly contrasted POC VL testing's faster results turnaround, higher accessibility, and likely cost-effectiveness against centralized VL testing. (2) Key informants also identified areas of improvement for POC VL testing in Kenya, such as quality control, human resource and infrastructure capacity, supply chain management, and integration of VL testing systems. (3) To enable successful scale-up of VL testing, key informants proposed expanding the POC VL testing scheme, electronic medical records systems, conducting quality checks locally, capacity building and developing strong partnerships between key stakeholders. Conclusion: The more accessible, decentralized model of POC VL testing was deemed capable of overcoming critical challenges associated with centralized VL testing and was considered highly desirable for optimizing VS for children and pregnant/postpartum women living with HIV. While POC VL testing has the potential to improve VS rates among these populations, additional research is needed to develop strategies for ensuring the sustainability of POC VL testing programs. Trial registration: NCT03820323, 29/01/2019 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14726963
Volume :
22
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
BMC Health Services Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
160841562
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08593-z