Back to Search
Start Over
What Belongs Together Retrieves Together -- The Role of Perceptual Grouping in Stimulus-Response Binding and Retrieval.
- Source :
-
Journal of Cognition . 2022, Vol. 5 Issue 1, p1-14. 14p. - Publication Year :
- 2022
-
Abstract
- Nowadays there is consensus that stimulus and response features are partially represented in the same coding format furthering the binding of these features into event files. If some or all features comprised in an event file repeat later, the whole file can be retrieved thereby modulating ongoing performance (leading to so-called stimulus-response binding effects). Stimulus-response binding effects are usually investigated in sequential priming paradigms where it is assumed that binding occurs in the prime and retrieval in the probe. Importantly, binding and retrieval are not exclusive for targets but also apply to distractor stimuli. A previous study showed that distractor-binding effects were affected by perceptual grouping: Binding effects were significantly larger when stimuli were grouped compared to ungrouped stimuli. Recent theorizing suggests that binding and retrieval are two separate processes that can be individually modulated. Against this background, it is not possible to pinpoint the modulating influence of perceptual grouping on either process at this point in time. Therefore, we adapted the previous study design in two experiments to observe the effect of perceptual grouping on both processes in isolation. Results indicate that perceptual grouping did not impact binding but retrieval: Distractor-response retrieval was reduced when target and distractor were presented in separate objects. Our results thus support recent theorizing on the separation of binding and retrieval. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 25144820
- Volume :
- 5
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Journal of Cognition
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 161036471
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.217