Back to Search Start Over

Assessment of the soluble proteins HMGB1, CD40L and CD62P during various platelet preparation processes and the storage of platelet concentrates: The BEST collaborative study.

Authors :
Cognasse, Fabrice
Hamzeh Cognasse, Hind
Eyraud, Marie Ange
Prier, Amélie
Arthaud, Charles Antoine
Tiberghien, Pierre
Begue, Stephane
de Korte, Dirk
Gouwerok, Eric
Greinacher, Andreas
Aurich, Konstanze
Noorman, Femke
Dumont, Larry
Kelly, Kathleen
Cloutier, Marc
Bazin, Renée
Cardigan, Rebecca
Huish, Sian
Smethurst, Peter
Devine, Dana
Source :
Transfusion. Jan2023, Vol. 63 Issue 1, p217-228. 12p.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: Structural and biochemical changes in stored platelets are influenced by collection and processing methods. This international study investigates the effects of platelet (PLT) processing and storage conditions on HMGB1, sCD40L, and sCD62P protein levels in platelet concentrate supernatants (PCs). Study Design/Methods: PC supernatants (n = 3748) were collected by each international centre using identical centrifugation methods (n = 9) and tested centrally using the ELISA/Luminex platform. Apheresis versus the buffy coat (BC‐PC) method, plasma storage versus PAS and RT storage versus cold (4°C) were investigated. We focused on PC preparation collecting samples during early (RT: day 1–3; cold: day 1–5) and late (RT: day 4–7; cold: day 7–10) storage time points. Results: HMGB1, sCD40L, and sCD62P concentrations were similar during early storage periods, regardless of storage solution (BC‐PC plasma and BC‐PC PAS‐E) or temperature. During storage and without PAS, sCD40L and CD62P in BC‐PC supernatants increased significantly (+33% and +41%, respectively) depending on storage temperature (22 vs. 4°C). However, without PAS‐E, levels decreased significantly (−31% and −20%, respectively), depending on storage temperature (22 vs. 4°C). Contrastingly, the processing method appeared to have greater impact on HMGB1 release versus storage duration. These data highlight increases in these parameters during storage and differences between preparation methods and storage temperatures. Conclusions: The HMGB1 release mechanism/intracellular pathways appear to differ from sCD62P and sCD40L. The extent to which these differences affect patient outcomes, particularly post‐transfusion platelet increment and adverse events, warrants further investigation in clinical trials with various therapeutic indications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00411132
Volume :
63
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Transfusion
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
161310674
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.17200