Back to Search Start Over

A comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis of IMP2 and IMP3 in 542 cases of ovarian tumors.

Authors :
Němejcová, Kristýna
Bártů, Michaela Kendall
Michálková, Romana
Drozenová, Jana
Fabian, Pavel
Fadare, Oluwole
Hausnerová, Jitka
Laco, Jan
Matěj, Radoslav
Méhes, Gábor
Singh, Naveena
Stolnicu, Simona
Škapa, Petr
Švajdler, Marián
Stružinská, Ivana
Cibula, David
Kocian, Roman
Lax, Sigurd F.
McCluggage, W. Glenn
Dundr, Pavel
Source :
Diagnostic Pathology. 2/6/2023, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p1-10. 10p.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: IMP2 and IMP3 are mRNA binding proteins involved in carcinogenesis. We examined a large cohort of ovarian tumors with the aim to assess the value of IMP2 and IMP3 for differential diagnosis, and to assess their prognostic significance. Methods: Immunohistochemical analyses with antibodies against IMP2 and IMP3 were performed on 554 primary ovarian tumors including 114 high grade serous carcinomas, 100 low grade serous carcinomas, 124 clear cell carcinomas, 54 endometrioid carcinomas, 34 mucinous carcinomas, 75 mucinous borderline tumors, and 41 serous borderline tumors (micropapillary variant). The associations of overall positivity with clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated using the chi-squared test or Fisher's Exact test. Results: We found IMP2 expression (in more than 5% of tumor cells) in nearly all cases of all tumor types, so the prognostic meaning could not be analyzed. The positive IMP3 expression (in more than 5% of tumor cells) was most common in mucinous carcinomas (82%) and mucinous borderline tumors (81%), followed by high grade serous (67%) and clear cell carcinomas (67%). The expression was less frequent in endometrioid carcinomas (39%), low grade serous carcinomas (23%), and micropapillary variant of serous borderline tumors (20%). Prognostic significance of IMP3 could be evaluated only in low grade serous carcinomas in the case of relapse-free survival, where negative cases showed better RFS (p = 0.033). Conclusion: Concerning differential diagnosis our results imply that despite the differences in expression in the different ovarian tumor types, the practical value for diagnostic purposes is limited. Contrary to other solid tumors, we did not find prognostic significance of IMP3 in ovarian cancer, with the exception of RFS in low grade serous carcinomas. However, the high expression of IMP2 and IMP3 could be of predictive value in ovarian carcinomas since IMP proteins are potential therapeutical targets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17461596
Volume :
18
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Diagnostic Pathology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
161692077
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-023-01300-4