Back to Search Start Over

Clinical, procedural and lead outcomes associated with different pacing techniques: a network meta-analysis.

Authors :
Mariani, Marco Valerio
Piro, Agostino
Forleo, Giovanni Battista
Della Rocca, Domenico Giovanni
Natale, Andrea
Miraldi, Fabio
Vizza, Carmine Dario
Lavalle, Carlo
Source :
International Journal of Cardiology. Apr2023, Vol. 377, p52-59. 8p.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

His- Purkinje system pacing (HPSP) techniques have been proposed as alternative to biventricular pacing (BVP) and right ventricular pacing (RVP). To compare data regarding clinical, procedural and lead outcomes associated with different pacing techniques. An accurate search of online scientific libraries (from inception to May, 12,022) was performed. Thirty-three studies were included in the meta-analysis involving 4386 patients, of whom 1324 receiving RVP, 1032 patients receiving BVP, 1069 patients receiving his-bundle pacing (HBP) and 968 patients receiving left bundle branch pacing (LBBP). LBBP provided a statistically significant increase in LVEF relative to HBP (0.4473 [0.0584; 0.8361] p = 0.0242) and BVP (0.6733 [0.4734; 0.8732] p < 0.0001) in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy indication. LBBP and HBP significantly decreased QRS duration as compared to BVP, with largest QRS narrowing obtained by LBBP (−0.4951 [−0.9077; −0.0824] p = 0.0187). As compared to LBBP, HBP was associated with a significant increase of pacing threshold (p = 0.0369) and significant reduction of R-wave amplitude over time (p = 0.027). LBBP was associated with significant reduction in RR of hospitalization for HF (HFH) as compared to both BVP (p = 0.0343) and HBP (p = 0.0476), whereas, as compared to RVP, the risk of lead issues was significantly higher with BVP (p = 0.0424) and HBP (p = 0.0298), but not for LBBP (p = 0.425). As compared to other pacing techniques, LBBP significantly improved LVEF, narrowed QRS duration and reduced HFHs, with steadily lower capture thresholds and higher R-wave amplitude, and without increasing lead issues. • The current network meta-analysis compared efficacy and safety outcomes related to different pacing techniques.; • Current analysis shows the benefits of his-bundle and left bundle pacing over right ventricular and biventricular pacing. • Left bundle branch pacing was associated with significant reduction in relative risk of hospitalization for heart failure. • Left bundle branch pacing did not increase the risk of lead issues as compared to other pacing techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01675273
Volume :
377
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
International Journal of Cardiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
162386212
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.01.081