The Role of Routine Ureteral Stenting Following Uncomplicated Ureteroscopic Treatment for Upper Ureteral and Renal Stones: A Randomized Control Trial.

Purpose: Ureteral stenting following uncomplicated ureteroscopy (URS) is common practice. Several studies have proven the safety of omitting routine stent placement following distal ureteral stone treatment. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the utility of stent placement for proximal URS. We designed a prospective, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the role of ureteral stent placement following URS for proximal ureteral and renal stones. Methods: Seventy-two patients with proximal ureteral or renal stones measuring as much as 1.5 cm were prospectively randomized into stented (37) or unstented (35) groups. The surgeon was blinded to the treatment group until after stone treatment. Patients tracked postoperative pain medications and completed validated pain questionnaires on postoperative days 0, 3, 7, and 28. Stents were removed on postoperative day 7. Postoperative follow-up imaging was obtained at 4 weeks. Results: No statistical differences were observed between the two groups in terms of demographics or stone characteristics. The operative time was longer in the stented group (p < 0.03). Patients in the stented group had more irritative urinary symptoms (p < 0.0001) and pain (p < 0.0001), missed more days of work (p < 0.01), and used more narcotics (p < 0.0005) during the first week, but no differences were observed at 30 days. Emergency room visits and overall complication rates were similar between the two groups. Three nonstented patients required stent placement. Two stented patients required early stent removal. Urinary tract infections developed in three stented patients, but not in unstented patients. Postoperative imaging did not reveal any hydronephrosis in either group, and the total stone-free rate was 94%. Conclusions: For most patients undergoing uncomplicated ureteroscopic treatment for proximal ureteral and kidney stones, it may be safe to omit ureteral stents to potentially decrease urinary symptoms and pain while improving short-term quality of life. Further studies with larger patient cohorts may be warranted to confirm our results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]