Back to Search Start Over

A comparative analysis of carbon reduction potential for directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines.

Authors :
Zhuo, Zhi‐Yu
Chen, Meng‐Jie
Li, Xiu‐Yu
Source :
Energy Science & Engineering. Mar2023, Vol. 11 Issue 3, p978-988. 11p.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Wind power generation does not emit greenhouse gases or pollutants, but there are some carbon emissions from the manufacturing, transportation, operation, and waste disposal of wind turbines. Directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines currently have the largest market share in China, but few Chinese studies have compared their differences in carbon reduction potential. This paper uses life cycle assessment (LCA) to quantitatively analyze the full life cycle carbon emissions of the two wind turbines to determine which type of wind turbine has greater carbon reduction potential, obtaining the following results. (1) The full life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of 2.5 MW directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines are 8.48 and 10.43 g CO2/kWh, respectively. The direct‐driven permanent magnet wind turbine is superior in terms of carbon reduction. (2) The stage with the greatest impact and the greatest difference between the two wind turbines in the full life cycle is the production stage, during which the carbon emissions of the directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines are 1.045 × 106 and 1.210 × 106 kg, respectively. (3) According to sensitivity analysis, proper waste disposal and transportation can reduce carbon emissions from wind turbines. These research findings can be used to help achieve carbon peaking and neutrality goals, as well as the technological development of wind power enterprises. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20500505
Volume :
11
Issue :
3
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Energy Science & Engineering
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
162417429
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.1425