Back to Search Start Over

Feature extraction and prediction of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) chemical constituents using four machine learning models.

Authors :
Lee, Young Su
Choi, Eunhwa
Park, Minjae
Jo, Hyeri
Park, Manho
Nam, Eunjung
Kim, Dai Gon
Yi, Seung-Muk
Kim, Jae Young
Source :
Expert Systems with Applications. Jul2023, Vol. 221, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

The concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM 2.5) constituents, which are very important and essential information for the identification of air pollution sources, were predicted at three sites (Seoul, Ulsan, Baengnyeong) in South Korea between 2016 and 2018 using four machine learning (ML) models: generative adversarial imputation network (GAIN), fully connected deep neural network (FCDNN), random forest (RF), and k-nearest neighbor (kNN). 3 PM 2.5 constituent groups, namely 8 ions, 2 carbons, and 15 trace elements, were targeted for prediction. The latest hyperparameter optimization techniques were used to learn air pollution characteristics from ambient PM 2.5 -related information, such as time, meteorology, and air pollutant concentrations. We compared the feature extraction abilities of the four models. The prediction accuracy identified by the coefficient of determination (R2) between prediction and observation was highest in GAIN, followed by FCDNN and RF or kNN. On availability of data on the time, air pollutant concentrations, and/or meteorology, simultaneously missed 20 % data of all PM 2.5 constituent groups were predicted, with R2 = 0.897, 0.861, 0.785, and 0.801 by the GAIN, FCDNN, RF, and kNN, respectively. As missing ratios (20 %, 40 %, 60 %, 80 %) of input data increased, prediction accuracy decreased in the four models and was predominantly more noticeable in GAIN and kNN. As the available period of data increased, prediction accuracy increased in GAIN and FCDNN. Trace elements were predicted with the lowest R2 in all models among the target constituent groups. Study sites with more emission sources showed lower prediction accuracy, resulting in the highest R2 in Baengnyeong island and the lowest in Ulsan. According to the current findings, ML models can be used to evaluate various air pollution issues for which data is missing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09574174
Volume :
221
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Expert Systems with Applications
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
162538311
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119696