Back to Search Start Over

A retrospective study of adjuvant proton radiotherapy for breast cancer after lumpectomy: a comparison of conventional-dose and hypofractionated dose.

Authors :
Hong, ZhengShan
Yang, ZhaoZhi
Mei, Xin
Li, Ping
Bao, Cihang
Wang, Zheng
Cai, Xin
Ming, Xue
Wang, WeiWei
Guo, XiaoMao
Yu, XiaoLi
Zhang, Qing
Source :
Radiation Oncology. 3/23/2023, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p1-11. 11p.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the adverse reactions of conventional-dose and hypofractionated dose of proton therapy for breast cancer. Materials and methods: Breast cancer patients treated with proton radiotherapy in conventional-dose or hypofractionated dose were studied retrospectively. Result: From January 2017 to December 2019, our center treated 50 patients following lumpectomy with proton radiotherapy. According to the AJCC 8th Edition standard, there were stage I in 26 patients, stage II in 22 patients, and stage III in 2 patients. A total of 14 patients received intensity-modulated proton therapy at a dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions, followed by a 10 Gy 4 fractionated boost to the lumpectomy cavity, while 36 received 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions, simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) 48 Gy to the lumpectomy cavity. Median follow-up time for 40.05 Gy group was 35.6 months (15–43 months). Median follow-up time for 50 Gy group was 46.8 months (36–68 months). For acute toxicity, the grade 1 and 2 radiodermatitis in conventional-dose group were 35.7% and 57.1%, respectively. In hypofractionated dose group, the grade 1 and 2 radiodermatitis were 91.7% and 8.3%, respectively. The radiodermatitis is hypofractionneted dose better than conventional-dose significantly. Grade 1 radiation-induced esophagitis in conventional-dose group and hypofractionated dose group were 85.71% and 60%, respectively. For late toxicity, no patients developed radiation-induced pneumonitis and rib fracture in conventional-dose group. Three patients presented grade 1 pneumonitis; one patient presented graded 2 pneumonitides and two patients presented rib fracture in hypofractionated dose group. One presented hypothyroidism in hypofractionated dose group. All patients were satisfied with breast shape. The one- and two-year OS and DFS for conventional-dose group were 100 and 100; 100 and 92.9%, respectively. The one- and two-year OS and DFS for hypofractionated dose group were 100 and 100; 100 and 100%, respectively. Conclusion: Proton radiation therapy can significantly reduce the normal tissue dose in breast cancer patients' hearts, lungs, and other organs. Hypofractionated proton therapy shortens the treatment course with mild radiation-related adverse effects, and has a better effect on addressing the acute adverse reactions than conventional proton radiotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1748717X
Volume :
18
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Radiation Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
162678193
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02213-8