Back to Search Start Over

Fine particulate matter and gas emissions at different burn phases from household coal-fired heating stoves.

Authors :
Li, Xinghua
Chen, Peng
Xie, Yan
Wang, Zihao
Hopke, Philip K.
Xue, Chunyu
Source :
Atmospheric Environment. Jul2023, Vol. 305, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Household coal burning contributes a large proportion of fine particulate matter (PM 2.5), black carbon (BC), organic carbon (OC), and CO emissions in China. Previous lab or field investigations generally measured short-term emissions from heating coal stoves, and only covered the high power phase or the flaming combustion processes, and did not consider smoldering combustion condition, which does not provide full characterization of the actual conditions in most cases. In this study, we investigated air pollutant emissions during the different burn phases of seven types of coal burned in a typical household coal-fired heating stove in the lab with a hood sampling system. We proposed a method to estimate coal consumption at the different burn phases, and thus quantify emission factors (EFs) at different burn phases. The concentrations of CO 2 , CO, SO 2 , NO x , and PM 2.5 fluctuated over 1 to 4 orders of magnitude during the whole burn cycle. The air pollutant concentration peaks, such as CO and PM 2.5 , were generally associated with coal addition. EFs of CO 2 , SO 2 , total water soluble inorganic ions (TWSIIs) followed the trend: high power phase > low power phase > banked fire phase. However, CO EFs followed the opposite trend, i.e., banked fire phase > low power phase > high power phase. EFs of NO x and EC in high power phase and low power phase were higher than those in banked fire phase. The variation in EFs of PM 2.5 and OC in different burn phases across seven types of coal burned in this study is complicated. When using EFs from high power phase or flaming phase to represent EFs from the whole process, CO 2 , SO 2 , NOx, EC and TWSIIs emissions will be overestimated, CO emissions will be underestimated, PM 2.5 and OC emissions may be overestimated or underestimated, depending on coal types. [Display omitted] • A method to quantify emissions in different burn phases was proposed. • Emission factors for burning seven coals in different burn phases were determined. • Using short time sampling to represent emission of whole burn cycle is inappropriate. • It is recommended that emissions from different burn phases be measured and included in emission estimate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13522310
Volume :
305
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Atmospheric Environment
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
163636597
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119803