Vinblastine/Methotrexate for Debilitating and Progressive Plexiform Neurofibroma in Children and Young Adults with Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Phase 2 Study.

Simple Summary: Limited effective therapies exist for the treatment of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)-associated plexiform neurofibroma (PN). The aim of our prospective clinical trial was to evaluate the activity and safety of vinblastine and methotrexate (conventional cytotoxic chemotherapies) given on a metronomic schedule in children and young adults with NF1 and PN. Of the 23 participants evaluable for treatment outcomes and toxicities, 14 completed all protocol therapy. There were no participants that discontinued therapy due to dose-limiting toxicities. In addition, there were no participants that demonstrated a partial response. VBL/MTX was well-tolerated but did not result in objective volumetric responses. Limited therapies exist for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)-associated plexiform neurofibroma (PN). For this reason, the activity of vinblastine (VBL) and methotrexate (MTX) was evaluated in children and young adults with NF1 and PN. Patients ≤ 25 years of age with progressive and/or inoperable NF1-PN received VBL 6 mg/m2 and MTX 30 mg/m2 weekly for 26 weeks, followed by every 2 weeks for 26 weeks. Objective response rate was the primary endpoint. Of 25 participants enrolled, 23 were evaluable. The median age of participants was 6.6 years (range 0.3–20.7). The most frequent toxicities were neutropenia and elevation of transaminases. On two-dimensional (2D) imaging, 20 participants (87%) had stable tumor, with a median time to progression of 41.5 months (95% confidence interval 16.9, 64.9). Two of eight participants (25%) with airway involvement demonstrated functional improvements including decreased positive pressure requirements and apnea-hypopnea index. A post hoc three-dimensional (3D) analysis of PN volumes was completed on 15 participants with amenable imaging; 7 participants (46%) had progressive disease on or by the end of therapy. VBL/MTX was well-tolerated but did not result in objective volumetric response. Furthermore, 3D volumetric analysis highlighted the lack of sensitivity of 2D imaging for PN response evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]