Back to Search Start Over

Techno-Economic and life cycle assessment of standalone Single-Stream material recovery facilities in the United states.

Authors :
Olafasakin, Olumide
Ma, Jiaze
Bradshaw, Sabrina L
Aguirre-Villegas, Horacio A.
Benson, Craig
Huber, George W.
Zavala, Victor M.
Mba-Wright, Mark
Source :
Waste Management. Jul2023, Vol. 166, p368-376. 9p.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

• Designed an automated Material Recovery Facility for mixed waste. • Estimated a capital cost of $23 MM for 120,000 tonne/year of MSW. • The NPV ranged from $3.57 to $60 MM based on location. • Global warming potentials ranged from 5.98 to 8.53 kg CO 2-eq /MT. Material Recovery Facilities (MRFs) are crucial players in achieving a circular economy. MRFs receive complex waste streams and separate valuable recyclables from these mixtures. This study conducts techno-economic analysis (TEA) to estimate the net present value (NPV) and life cycle assessment (LCA) to estimate different environmental impacts of a commercial scale standalone, single-stream MRF to assess the economic feasibility and environmental impacts of recovering valuable recyclables from an MRF processing 120,000 tonnes per year (t/y). The TEA employs a discounted cash flow rate of return (DCFROR) analysis over a 20-year facility lifetime, along with a sensitivity analysis on the impact of different operating and economic parameters. Results show that the total fixed cost of building the MRF facility is $23 MM, and the operating cost is $45.48/tonne. The NPV of the MRF can vary from $3.57 MM to $60 MM, while 100-year global warming potential can range from 5.98 to 8.53 kg carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2-eq) per tonne of MSW. We have also found that MSW composition (arising from regional effects) significantly impacts costs, 100-year global warming potential, and other impact categories such as acidification potential, eutrophication potential, ecotoxicity, ozone depletion, photochemical oxidation, carcinogenic effects, and non-carcinogenic effects. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis indicate that waste composition and market prices significantly impact the profitability of the MRF, and the waste composition mostly impacts global warming potential. Our analysis also indicates that facility capacity, fixed capital cost, and waste tipping fees are vital parameters that affect the economic viability of MRF operations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0956053X
Volume :
166
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Waste Management
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
163996021
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2023.05.011